9.19.2012

Freeman's Maple - Acer X freemanii



The tree in it's attempt to take over that poor little old lady. RUN LITTLE OLD LADY!
This is a natural hybrid of A. rubrum and A. saccharum -> red maple and silver maple.
It has the best traits of both species: it grows faster than red maple; it has stronger wood and better fall color (remember, red maples have GREAT fall color, but silvers suck).






I like this bark better than some
It's not so.. boring.
Look, texture! Brown tones! Highlights!










There is a long petiole (quite long; and the petiole is the connector between the base of the leaf and the stem) and it's red. Red maples aren't consistently much of anything - they can be red, or not, or striped; they can have open canopies, or not; you get the idea. Remember? Well, Freeman's Maple tends to be a bit more consistent.






 It also doesn't have the silver under the leaf  and has deeply dissected lobes (think fingers as opposed to paws: paws tend to be rounded with very little in-between-the-toes space, while fingers have a ton of space between the toes). There are 3 lobes. This sets it way apart from the two species it was born from.










These are the samaras - seeds. They're very distinctive. If you remember the norway, they were glossy and a fresh froggy-green color. These are, well, red. Look how pretty they actually are!

Norway Maple - A. platanoides


This is a native of northern Europe, and once was one of the most commonly planted shade-and-street trees in the US. It has rapid growth and tolerates urban conditions such as air pollutants, cold temperatures and poor soils. It does lift up sidewalks with the roots, however, and the samaras get everywhere (much like any other maple, or the acorns from oaks). It is considered invasive and is prohibted to plant in MA; Connecticut considers it to be invasive but hasn't banned it, yet.



Samaras

The leaf, which can be confused with Sugar Maple











Zone 7 is the furthest south it is willing to travel.
Siting the species into a cool microclimate will aid in successfull establishment (planting it in cool places makes it happy).
There are plenty of cultivars (plants hybridized and grown for specific reasons, and don't occur naturally) that are supposed to be prettier, or have more heat tolerance, so this tree is doing its best to be diverse.
A cute tree, I think.

 The tree is obviously a bit rounded and doesn't grow out quite as much as other maples. It is a cute little thing, but apparently it's a pest in some places (meaning it puts other trees out, trying to take over and whatnot - otherwise known as 'invasive'). Even so, I happen to like it.

White Oak - Q. alba


This is in Baltimore at the UMD Botanical Gardens, or some such.

The spread on this tree can be extremely wide. This is why it is recommended to give it a LOT of reach-room!
White oaks set the standard for a lot of other oaks. A very large tree when fully grown, it grows into an awe-inspiring oval or rounded outline. The leaves are dark green or blue-green and have rounded lobes that turn to brown, red or burgundy in the fall. This is a tree best transplanted only when young, and lives for quite some time. Considering it's grandeur (and the fact that it doesn't branch like a Bur Oak), this is a tree that's fairly simple to identify.
This can easily be found here: University of Connecticut

The tree enjoys full sun and demands it: it'll grow over just about anything else, becoming a fantastic shade tree. It takes up a pretty large area, but is one of the most desirable, attractive oaks available.




It does enjoy more acidic soil and dislikes being disturbed (not a fan of compaction, construction). It is a slow growing tree, which isn't a surprise due to its size and wood strength. One must be cautious of gypsy moths (kill on sight!) Generally, though, damage is rarely significant.






These are young spring-growth leaves

White, chunky bark is attractive year round - if you're into white, chunky bark.

 This is a GREAT tree to preserve if it is located on a property that may have some contruction done. But, this is also one of those trees that can take a beating from construction. Be extra careful when it comes to protecting large trees such as this, because it can take years before it actually shows wear and tear - and by then, we generally have moved on and quit worrying, right?
 

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/9c/White_oak_Quercus_alba_prolific_acorns.jpg
Acorns are fairly large and the caps appear to cover perhaps a half of the nut.


Pre-flood!

Hello everyone!
I have about 65 plants that we've gone over in the course. I've gone over 8 here. You can see why I was a bit disappointed in falling behind.
You can also see why I named this 'pre-flood'. I intend to shove out as many plants as possible in the next week. I will put up as many pictures for ID purposes as possible but I will NOT be editing any, or adding any of my own embellishments. We get enough of that with the Plant ID weekly sheets (and due to how we were rained out yesterday, we get to put about 30 into one assignment in two weeks. Lovely.)

So, I will do my best to make sense. I also have a lot of other homework and studies to get to, but I'm doing my best to keep this at the top of my priority list. I intend to shove out about 13-15 trees a day to get caught up.


In the future, however, there will be 'shrubs and small trees', which include things such as crepe myrtles and hydrangea. So, things should become a lot more colorful and interesting. =)

Happy planting!

9.11.2012

Updates coming!

I have a lot of plants to go over and not a lot of time (today), BUT after my quiz today I should have time to compile all 48+ trees (that includes what I've already posted) and begin putting them here.
I do apologize. I've fallen a little behind and then caught a virus, so I'm scrambling to catch up. I've got a plan, though, so things should get back to the way I intended them to be -- soon!

                               Bald Cypress Trees                                                                                                                                    upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/46/Taxodium_distichum_NRCSMS01010.jpg



9.01.2012

American Elm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_elm

Ulmus americana is the tree you're thinking of, if you know anything about popular US trees that happened to nearly get wiped out because of Dutch Elm Disease. It's a larger tree, as one can see, and was practically perfect: it's fast growing but still has good wood (a lot of fast growing trees stink when it comes to wood quality); it rarely splits  - limbs can have some angles and it deals with that just fine; the internal veins of the tree are actually criss-crossed and this adds some strength to the wood. 

Due to its awesomeness it became the most widely planted tree in the US. 
People planted it everywhere. It went in yards, down streetsides.. The fungus would then go from one tree to the next and the next: limbs often touched each other, which was, in hindsight, a bad idea.

Now we have genus' (cultivars: not naturally occurring 'hybrids') that were bred to fight off Dutch Elm Disease. The disease was easily spread by beetles carrying the fungal infection, which essentially would freak out the tree and it would begin to start losing limbs (imagine cutting off body parts to escape never-ending gangrene, or flesh eating disease.)  Eventually, the whole tree dies from its own attempt to block off the offending presence of the fungus. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_elm
I happen to like the bark. It has some shape to it, and some highlights. It has no real uniform presence, but rather seems to have furrows that flow down the trunk as if water used to exist on it. 

http://www.sfrc.ufl.edu/4h/AmericanElm/AmericanElmLeafWeb.jpg

 These leaves are what we call pinnate: there are 7, where the odd-leaf-out is at the tip. They're serrated and rough (like the willow, remember?) and are bilaterally asymmetrical: folding them in half doesn't give any superimposition; one side of the half will be bigger than the other.



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_elm

The tree has decent fall color, but if fall color is what you're looking for then I'd personally go elsewhere. However, I can't really say that's a good idea: the American Elm is a very pretty, robust type of tree. Dutch Elm, of course, is always a fear, but there are cultivars being developed that resist this problem better and better as time goes on. Eventually, our pretty tree will be back. I wonder if it'll be as popular once more??

Willow Oak

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Willow_oak
Otherwise known as Quercus phellos, is a big tree that transplants easily, grows easily and takes 'bad' soils. If one remembers about trees from my earlier posts, I seemed to lean toward the idea that fast-growing large trees like to toss limbs after a while. This one will toss a few, but not as badly as some similarly-growing trees. 

They have a full crown and generally grow to be pretty symmetrical. They grow down south pretty readily; up north, the similar option to cultivate is the pin oak. I've heard good things about both; people seem pretty bias toward one or the other for various reasons, but it's too hot down here for a pin oak.

The willow oak is pretty common here on Clemson campus, and have a nice fall color - usually. From what I've seen, the tree can be green, red or yellowy, which isn't half bad. It's commonly planted because of the good qualities I've mentioned, but it also gets bigger than some planners expect. It ends up putting roots through sidewalks and things because of that.


http://www.duke.edu/~cwcook/trees/quph50728.jpg
See the leaves? They cluster at the end (terminal bud). That's an oak trait. Maples, if you remember, like to go in pairs and don't really cluster like this at the end of the limb. Oaks tend to alternate and have two general differences: red oaks tend to have pointy little leaves like this picture up here. White oaks have rounded-tipped leaves. The two cannot interbreed, and so knowing how their leaves are (pointed or dull and rounded) is really helpful in identifying it.

forestfarm.com/images/products/3833/quph100v3.jpg


Notably, it's called a willow oak for a reason: it has leaves that are similar to a weeping willow (such as the Babylon Weeping Willow, Salix babylonica) but, apart from that, they aren't incredibly similar. Weeping willow, well, weeps, for one. If that doesn't tip you off, then I've got bad news for you.


gardens.missouri.edu/about/descriptions/treetrails/TTmaps/LowryMallPhotos/lowryweb/Quercus-phellos-fall-lg.jpg






forestry.sfasu.edu/faculty/jstovall/dendro//
images/tree_photos/querphel/querphel_fruit1.jpg

cas.vanderbilt.edu/
bioimages/biohires/q/hquph--fr15633.jpg

 This is a large tree.
 It has tiny acorns.
 Tiny, cute little acorns.






The bark is slightly furrowed and a medium-dark brown-grey sort of tone; I think I'd be careful not to mistake this with pine, myself, but I may be weird (no one opposes this).

http://www.discoverlife.org/IM/I_SB/0111/320/Quercus_phellos,_bark_-_of_a_large_tree,I_SB11159.jpg


Bald Cypress

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_cypress



I put this as the header photo for a particular reason. I think whenever I come up with bald cypress (otherwise known as Taxodium distichum), I think I'll likely think of bogs and marshes. A fan of wet places (or, at least, it seems perfectly fine being in those types of places; the ones on campus aren't exactly flooded, so it seems to be fine either way) it puts up little 'knees'. They were once thought to help the plant 'breath' - to collect or let off different gases depending on its needs - but that school of thought is out the window. Currently, it's thought that these growths are to keep the soil from washing away too far from the roots, like a truss.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_cypress

Pyramidal in shape, the tree has needles year round but is not evergreen: they yellow and dry out, then fall off. They come back the next year, though; this process will scare some people, making them think they're little Christmas tree had died off. 
The tree is about a zone 6, and can reach up to around D.C. and Philadelphia before it just gets too cold - but it always keeps to the coast.

The tree is pretty great, though, and lends a nice, soft pine kind of feel to the landscape. It seems to grow more up than out (hence the pyramidal shape), so it isn't great for shade. I do like seeing them on campus: they seem to stick out from all the other trees. It's also the state tree of Louisiana as of 1963. I don't know about you, but when I think of Louisiana I think of swamps.



The needles give it a very soft appearance, and they feel similar to how they appear. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_cypress

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_cypress
The cones are little (not near the size you think of squirrels chewing on from those huge pines). 



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bald_cypress
The bark is shallow, though, and very easily damaged. It does appear very delicate, especially in comparison to things such as the maples I've posted about. It looks flaky.